Editorial Statement for November 2007: Election 2008

Don't blink. Next year at this time, we will be very close to voting for our next president. A year will go by just like that. Just look how quickly this year has gone by!

For this month, I'll be discussing each of the presidential candidates. Now's the time to do it, because by this time next year, we'll be down to two - or maybe three, if there's an independent.

And in truth, I hope that there is an independent candidate. Even though I'll be talking about each of the candidates, I don't really like any of them so far. Both Democrats and the GOP are trying to play it safe and are sticking to candidates that won't upset their respective apple carts too much.

Ralph Nader, a candidate in 2000 and 2004, is suing the Democratic party over their alleged efforts to keep him off the ballot in 2004. I hope the case goes to trial, and I hope that it becomes very public, because I want one of these parties to get exposed for their efforts to keep third parties from growing. We deserve more choices than Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum. I'll be posting the text of the article after I finish this entry, because the articles don't generally stay up for more than two weeks, and I want us all to be able to follow the progress of this lawsuit.

Anyway, I'll be discussing each candidate one at a time during the course of the month. During the weekend, I'll post a schedule of which candidate I'll discuss at what time. And then later in the month, I'll try to introduce some of the third parties out there so that you know that they are out there.

---------------------------------------------------

Ralph Nader sues Democratic Party (Yahoo! News Oct. 30, 2007)

WASHINGTON - Consumer advocate and 2004 independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader sued the Democratic Party on Tuesday, contending officials conspired to keep him from taking votes away from nominee John Kerry.

Nader's lawsuit, filed in District of Columbia Superior Court, also named as co-defendants Kerry's campaign, the Service Employees International Union and several so-called 527 organizations such as America Coming Together, which were created to promote voter turnout on behalf of the Democratic ticket.

The lawsuit also alleges that the Democratic National Committee conspired to force Nader off the ballot in several states.

"The Democratic Party is going after anyone who presents a credible challenge to their monopoly over their perceived voters," Nader said in a statement. "This lawsuit was filed to help advance a free and open electoral process for all candidates and voters. Candidate rights and voter rights nourish each other for more voices, choices, and a more open and competitive democracy."

Among other things, the lawsuit alleges that the DNC tried to bankrupt Nader's campaign by suing to keep him off the ballot in 18 states. It also suggests the DNC sent Kerry supporters to crash a Nader petition drive in Portland, Ore., in June 2004, preventing him from collecting enough signatures to get on the ballot.

The lawsuit seeks "compensatory damages, punitive damages and injunctive relief to enjoin the defendants from ongoing and future violations of the law."

Nader's attorney, Bruce Afran, argued that the DNC would be terrified of having the case come to trial. He said he hoped the committee would choose to settle the case and apologize.

"This is a case designed to make sure other independent and third party candidates will not be subject to the same kind of conspiracy in the future," Afran said.

Nader received 463,653 votes in the election, or 0.38% of total votes cast.

DNC spokesman Luis Miranda declined comment on the suit, citing a policy on pending litigation.